Abstract
Background— The relation between
endogenous testosterone concentrations and health in men is controversial.
Methods and Results— We examined the prospective
relationship between endogenous testosterone concentrations and mortality due
to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in a nested case-control
study based on 11 606 men aged 40 to 79 years surveyed in 1993 to 1997 and
followed up to 2003. Among those without prevalent cancer or cardiovascular
disease, 825 men who subsequently died were compared with a control group of
1489 men still alive, matched for age and date of baseline visit. Endogenous
testosterone concentrations at baseline were inversely related to mortality due
to all causes (825 deaths), cardiovascular disease (369 deaths), and cancer
(304 deaths). Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for mortality for
increasing quartiles of endogenous testosterone compared with the lowest
quartile were 0.75 (0.55 to 1.00), 0.62 (0.45 to 0.84), and 0.59 (0.42 to
0.85), respectively (P<0.001 for trend after
adjustment for age, date of visit,
body mass index, systolic blood pressure, blood cholesterol, cigarette smoking,
diabetes mellitus, alcohol intake, physical activity, social class, education,
dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstanediol glucuronide, and sex hormone
binding globulin). An increase of 6 nmol/L serum testosterone (≈1 SD) was
associated with a 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.92, P<0.01) multivariable-adjusted odds ratio
for mortality.
Inverse relationships were also observed for deaths due to cardiovascular
causes and cancer and after the exclusion of deaths that occurred in the first
2 years.
Conclusions— In men, endogenous
testosterone concentrations are inversely related to mortality due to
cardiovascular disease and all causes. Low testosterone may be a predictive
marker for those at high risk of cardiovascular disease.
The role
of testosterone in men’s health is still controversial.
High doses of exogenous testosterone or other anabolic steroids have been
associated with adverse health effects, including sudden cardiac death and
liver disease.1–4Nevertheless,
hypogonadism in men is also adversely associated with health, and the use of
lower doses of exogenous testosterone is increasingly widespread because of the
belief that supplementation has benefits for well-being.5,6Although a
recent trial in 87 elderly men reported no significant effect of low-dose
testosterone replacement on body composition, physical performance, or quality
of life, that study did not address the relationship with clinical event end
points, and the authors concluded that additional long-term studies of
testosterone were warranted.7,8
Editorial p 2658
Clinical Perspective p 2701
Surprisingly,
the relationship between endogenous testosterone
concentrations within the physiological range and overall health in men is
still not well established. High endogenous testosterone concentrations in men
are associated with a more favorable cardiovascular disease risk factor
profile, including higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol
concentrations and lower blood pressure, blood triglyceride, and glucose
concentrations.9–17 However, prospective studies
to date have not found significant relationships between endogenous
testosterone concentrations and cardiovascular disease events.18–24Conversely, high endogenous
testosterone concentrations have
been postulated to be a risk factor for prostate cancer, although again,
prospective studies have found no consistent relationships.25 Most of these studies had
limited power for disease events. We present data from a prospective population
study examining the relationship between endogenous testosterone concentrations
and subsequent mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer
in middle-aged and older men.
Previous SectionNext Section
Methods
The men were participants in the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk), a prospective population
study of 11 606 men and 14 033 women 40 to 79 years of age, 99% white,
recruited from age-sex registers of general practices in Norfolk, United
Kingdom, who answered a baseline questionnaire and attended a clinic visit.
They were comparable to national population samples with respect to many
characteristics.26
At the baseline survey in 1993 to 1997, participants completed
detailed questionnaires. They were asked about medical history, occupational
and educational status, smoking history, alcohol consumption, and physical
activity, as described in detail elsewhere.26–28
A health examination was performed by trained nurses using a
standardized protocol at a clinic visit. This included anthropometry measures
and blood pressure measured with an Accutorr monitor after the participant had
been seated for 5 minutes. The mean of 2 readings was used for analysis.
Nonfasting blood samples taken at the visit were stored in a refrigerator at
4°C overnight, then processed for assays or for frozen storage. Clinic visits
were between 9 AM and 4PM. Fresh samples for lipid measurements were assayed at the
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Cambridge University. Serum total
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride were measured with the RA 1000
(Bayer Diagnostics, Basingstoke, United Kingdom), and low-density lipoprotein
(LDL) cholesterol values were calculated with the Friedewald formula. Blood
samples for storage were stored as separate 500-μL aliquots of serum and plasma
in sealed straws in liquid nitrogen at −120°C.
All participants were
flagged for death certification at the Office of National Statistics United
Kingdom, with vital status ascertained on the entire cohort. Death certificates
were coded by trained nosologists according to the International Classification
of Diseases, 9th or 10th revision (ICD9 or ICD10, respectively). A death due to
cardiovascular causes was defined as ICD9 400 to 448 or ICD10 I10 to I79 listed
as the underlying cause of death; coronary heart disease was ICD9 410 to 414 or
ICD10 I20 to I25; and cancer was ICD9 140 to 208 or ICD10 C00 to C97.
In 2003, after the
exclusion of 1183 men who reported having cardiovascular disease or cancer at
the baseline visit in 1993 to 1997, which left 10 423 men, we identified men
who had died because of any cause and up to 2 sex-matched, age-matched (±3
years), and date-of-visit–matched (±3 months) control subjects from the cohort
who were still alive. The average follow-up time in the present analysis was 7
years (range 1 to 125 months). Frozen serum samples identified from case and
control subjects taken at the baseline visit in 1993 to 1997 were retrieved
from the liquid nitrogen stores. Total testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone
sulfate, and sex hormone binding globulin were assayed in a research laboratory
with an Immulite Chemiluminescent Immunoassay System (DPC, Gwynedd, United
Kingdom) and androstanediol glucuronide with a radioimmunoassay (DSL-6000,
Diagnostic Systems Laboratories Inc, Webster, Tex). The intra-assay precision,
interassay precision, and sensitivity for testosterone were 7.5%, 6.6%, and 0.3
nmol/L, respectively, and for sex hormone binding globulin, they were 6.1%,
7.5%, and 0.2 nmol/L, respectively.
The study was
approved by the Norwich District Health Authority Ethics Committee, and all
participants gave signed informed consent. The present analysis was based on
825 men without prevalent cardiovascular disease and cancer in 1993 to 1997 who
had since died and 1489 control subjects who were alive in 2003.
We compared risk
factor distributions by mortality status and by quartile groups of endogenous
testosterone. Although some variables were slightly skewed, results were
similar when log transformed, so the untransformed data are shown for ease of
interpretation. Although we matched total mortality cases and controls
individually for age and date of visit, to enable us to conduct the analyses on
subgroups by cause of death and after exclusion of deaths in the first 2 years,
we used unconditional logistic regression to determine the odds ratios (ORs) of
mortality by testosterone quartile group, incorporating for matching in the
analysis by including age and visit date as covariates in all analyses. In
these circumstances, unconditional logistic regression that is adjusted for
matching will be essentially the same as conditional logistic regression. We
used logistic regression to determine the ORs of mortality by testosterone
quartile group, then used testosterone as a continuous variable after adjusting
for age and date of visit, and then for age, date of visit, and other
covariates. Analyses were also run with a Cox regression model, and results
were similar. Results are presented for the logistic regression modeling as the
generally accepted method for case-control analyses. Nevertheless, we also
examined time-dependent survival curves by testosterone quartile using the Cox
model. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago,
Ill).
The authors had full access to the data and take full
responsibility for its integrity. All authors have read and agree to the
manuscript as written.
Previous SectionNext Section
Results
Table 1 shows baseline
measurements in men who subsequently died from all causes, cardiovascular
disease, and cancer, as well as control subjects who were still alive. Mean
testosterone concentrations were lower in men who died of any cause,
cardiovascular disease, or cancer than in control subjects. Mean waist-hip
ratio, prevalence of cigarette smoking, and prevalence of diabetes mellitus
were also higher in men who died of any cause, cardiovascular disease, or
cancer than in control subjects. Men who died of any cause or of cardiovascular
causes had significantly higher mean systolic blood pressure and blood
triglycerides. Men who died of cardiovascular causes also had significantly
higher mean body mass index, serum cholesterol, and LDL:HDL cholesterol ratios.
Of the 304 cancer deaths identified, there were 55 lung, 50 prostate, 37
colorectal, 15 esophageal, and 11 stomach cancer deaths.
Table 1.
Description of Baseline Variables in Men 42 to 78 Years of Age Who Died
Subsequently Because of All Causes, Cardiovascular Diseases, and Cancer
Compared With Age-Matched Controls in EPIC-Norfolk 1993 to 2003
|
Testosterone, nmol/L, mean (SD)
|
16.7
(5.7)
|
15.8
(5.7)
|
<0.001
|
15.7
(6.1)
|
<0.01
|
15.6
(6.5)
|
<0.01
|
SHBG, nmol/L, mean
(SD)
|
45.0
(16.2)
|
45.4
(18.3)
|
0.57
|
45.2
(18.2)
|
0.85
|
43.7
(17.4)
|
0.23
|
Testosterone/SHBG
ratio, mean (SD)
|
0.39
(0.14)
|
0.37
(0.15)
|
<0.001
|
0.37
(0.13)
|
<0.001
|
0.38
(0.17)
|
0.07
|
DHEAS, μmol/L, mean
(SD)
|
2.87
(1.81)
|
2.82
(1.96)
|
0.55
|
2.66
(1.79)
|
0.05
|
3.09
(2.15)
|
0.02
|
Androstanediol
glucuronide, nmol/L, mean (SD)
|
14.0
(8.0)
|
14.7
(9.1)
|
0.07
|
15.2
(9.5)
|
0.02
|
14.2
(8.4)
|
0.71
|
Age, y, mean (SD)
|
67.0
(6.6)
|
67.8
(6.7)
|
0.01
|
68.3
(6.4)
|
<0.01
|
67.0
(6.6)
|
0.98
|
Body mass index,
kg/m2, mean (SD)
|
26.6
(3.1)
|
26.8
(3.6)_
|
0.09
|
27.1(3.7)
|
<0.01
|
26.8
(3.3)
|
0.27
|
Waist-hip ratio,
mean (SD)
|
0.94
(0.06)
|
0.95
(0.06)
|
<0.001
|
0.95
(0.06)
|
<0.01
|
0.95
(0.06)
|
<0.01
|
Systolic blood
pressure, mm Hg, mean (SD)
|
141.9
(18.3)
|
143.8
(20.0)
|
0.02
|
145.5
(19.0)
|
<0.001
|
143.9
(19.5)
|
0.08
|
Diastolic blood
pressure, mm Hg, mean (SD)
|
84.9
(11.6)
|
85.4
(12.4)
|
0.33
|
86.2
(12.3)
|
0.05
|
85.3
(11.7)
|
0.59
|
Cholesterol, mmol/L,
mean (SD)
|
6.09
(1.04)
|
6.07
(1.19)
|
0.65
|
6.25
(1.15)
|
0.01
|
5.97
(1.18)
|
0.07
|
LDL cholesterol,
mmol/L, mean (SD)
|
3.99
(0.93)
|
3.93
(1.03)
|
0.15
|
4.09
(1.02)
|
0.09
|
3.82
(1.00
|
0.01
|
HDL cholesterol,
mmol/L, mean (SD)
|
1.24
(0.32)
|
1.22
(0.37)
|
0.44
|
1.20
(0.33)
|
0.08
|
1.22
(3.72)
|
0.44
|
LDL/HDL ratio, mean
(SD)
|
3.43
(1.16)
|
3.46
(1.27)
|
0.62
|
3.63
(2.38)
|
<0.01
|
3.38
(1.22)
|
0.46
|
Triglycerides,
mmol/L, mean (SD)
|
1.98
(1.07)
|
2.08
(1.20)
|
0.04
|
2.23(1.37)
|
<0.001
|
2.04
(1.08)
|
0.37
|
Alcohol intake,
U/wk, mean (SD)
|
8.7
(10.0)
|
9.4
(13.2)
|
0.12
|
7.8
(10.7)
|
0.13
|
11.0
(14.6)
|
<0.01
|
History of diabetes,
% (n)
|
2.9
(43)
|
8.0
(66)
|
<0.001
|
9.5
(35)
|
<0.001
|
6.9
(64)
|
<0.001
|
History of
hypertension, % (n)
|
16.9
(251)
|
25.7
(212)
|
<0.001
|
31.5
(116)
|
<0.001
|
22.4
(68)
|
0.01
|
History of high
cholesterol, % (n)
|
8.6
(128)
|
10.4
(86)
|
0.09
|
14.1
(52)
|
<0.001
|
8.2
(25)
|
0.47
|
Aspirin use, % (n)
|
18.9
(240)
|
26.2
(174)
|
<0.001
|
35.9
(107)
|
<0.001
|
18.0
(44)
|
0.40
|
Cigarette smokers, %
(n)
|
|
|
<0.001
|
|
<0.001
|
|
0.01
|
Current
|
9.1
(134)
|
13.5
(110)
|
|
15.8
(58)
|
|
11.4
(34)
|
|
Former
|
61.4
(902)
|
65.5
(535)
|
|
64.2
(235)
|
|
66.2
(198)
|
|
Never
|
29.6
(435)
|
21.1
(172)
|
|
19.9
(73)
|
|
22.4
(67)
|
|
Physical activity:
inactive, % (n)
|
33.5
(499)
|
49.8
(386)
|
<0.001
|
48.5
(179)
|
<0.001
|
38.8
(118)
|
0.13
|
Social class, % (n)
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
0.25
|
|
0.11
|
Nonmanual
|
59.0 (860)
|
54.4 (434)
|
|
55.5 (197)
|
|
53.9 (159)
|
|
Manual
|
41.0 (598)
|
45.6 (364)
|
|
44.5 (158)
|
|
46.1 (136)
|
|
Education level, %
(n)
|
|
|
<0.001
|
|
0.01
|
|
0.02
|
No
qualification
|
36.2 (538)
|
45.7 (377)
|
|
44.4 (164)
|
|
44.1 (134)
|
|
Completed
school
|
51.5 (765)
|
44.8 (369)
|
|
45.3 (171)
|
|
46.8 (142)
|
|
Completed
university
|
12.4 (185)
|
9.6 (79)
|
|
9.2 (34)
|
|
9.2 (28)
|
|
SHBG indicates sex hormone binding
globulin; DHEAS,
dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.*Probability value of cases vs controls, with t test
used to compare continuous
variables and χ2 test
used for categorical variables.†Exact numbers may vary slightly because of
missing data for some variables. n=2314 for testosterone, n=2287 with cholesterol;
n=2172 with LDL and HDL cholesterol.
Table 2 shows the distribution of variables
by quartile
group of serum testosterone level. Testosterone concentrations were significantly
inversely related to body mass index, waist-hip ratio, triglycerides, and
prevalence of diabetes mellitus and were positively related to total
cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol concentrations and to
cigarette smoking habit.
Table 2.
Description of Baseline Variables in 2314 Men* 42 to 78 Years of Age by Quartile
Group of
Serum Testosterone in EPIC-Norfolk 1993 to 1997
|
Quartile Groups of Testosterone
|
1 <12.5 nmol/L (n=569)
|
2 12.5–15.6 nmol/L (n=595)
|
3 15.7–19.6 nmol/L (n=568)
|
4 >19.6 nmol/L (n=582)
|
P for Trend
|
SHBG indicates sex
hormone binding globulin; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.
|
Values are mean
(SD). Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and categorical values with
the χ2 test.
|
*Exact numbers may
vary slightly because of missing data for some variables. n=2314 for
testosterone, n=2287 with cholesterol; n=2172 with LDL and HDL cholesterol.
|
Testosterone,
nmol/L, mean (SD)
|
9.5 (2.5)
|
14.1 (0.96)
|
17.5 (1.09)
|
24.2 (4.40)
|
|
SHBG, nmol/L, mean
(SD)
|
35.2 (13.3)
|
41.7 (13.9)
|
46.6 (12.9)
|
56.9 (19.0)
|
<0.001
|
Testosterone/SHBG
ratio, mean (SD)
|
0.31 (0.13)
|
0.37 (0.12)
|
0.40 (0.11)
|
0.46 (0.15)
|
<0.001
|
DHEAS, μmol/L, mean
(SD)
|
2.44 (1.65)
|
2.92 (1.83)
|
2.86 (1.82)
|
3.19 (2.04)
|
0.01
|
Androstanediol
glucuronide, nmol/L, mean (SD)
|
12.1 (7.9)
|
14.2 (7.8)
|
14.3 (7.8)
|
16.4 (8.3)
|
0.04
|
Age, y, mean (SD)
|
67.7 (6.6)
|
67.2 (6.7)
|
67.3 (6.7)
|
66.9 (6.6)
|
0.06
|
Body mass index,
kg/m2, mean (SD)
|
27.7 (3.5)
|
26.7 (3.1)
|
26.5 (3.2)
|
25.7 (3.1)
|
<0.001
|
Waist-hip ratio,
mean (SD)
|
0.96 (0.06)
|
0.96 (0.06)
|
0.94 (0.06)
|
0.93 (0.06)
|
<0.001
|
Systolic blood
pressure, mm Hg, mean (SD)
|
143.0 (19.6)
|
142.4 (18.3)
|
144.0 (19.5)
|
141.0 (18.5)
|
0.22
|
Diastolic blood
pressure, mm Hg, mean (SD)
|
85.2 (12.4)
|
84.9 (11.8)
|
85.6 (11.7)
|
84.7 (11.6)
|
0.63
|
Cholesterol, mmol/L,
mean (SD)
|
5.94 (1.15)
|
6.10 (1.09)
|
6.08 (1.03)
|
6.19 (1.08)
|
<0.001
|
LDL cholesterol,
mmol/L, mean (SD)
|
3.78 (0.96)
|
3.95 (0.94)
|
3.99 (0.54)
|
4.13 (0.56)
|
<0.001
|
HDL cholesterol,
mmol/L, mean (SD)
|
1.18 (0.33)
|
1.24 (0.34)
|
1.24 (0.34)
|
1.28 (0.34)
|
<0.001
|
LDL/HDL ratio, mean
(SD)
|
3.41 (1.15)
|
3.41 (1.17)
|
3.44 (1.20)
|
3.51 (1.27)
|
0.13
|
Triglycerides,
mmol/L, mean (SD)
|
2.25 (1.27)
|
2.20 (1.16)
|
1.92 (1.03)
|
1.81 (0.96)
|
<0.001
|
Alcohol intake,
U/wk, mean (SD)
|
8.1 (9.7)
|
9.2 (11.7)
|
9.5 (12.1)
|
8.9 (11.2)
|
0.21
|
History of diabetes,
% (n)
|
7.9 (45)
|
4.4 (26)
|
4.8 (27)
|
1.9 (11)
|
<0.001
|
History of
hypertension, % (n)
|
22.5 (128)
|
23.4 (139)
|
16.9 (96)
|
17.2 (100)
|
<0.01
|
History of high
cholesterol, % (n)
|
8.3 (47)
|
9.7 (58)
|
9.2 (52)
|
9.8 (57)
|
0.79
|
Aspirin use, % (n)
|
24.0 (357)
|
21.1 (103)
|
23.0 (111)
|
17.7 (87)
|
0.08
|
Cigarette smokers, %
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
<0.01
|
Current
|
9.1 (51)
|
8.5 (50)
|
11.3 (64)
|
13.8 (79)
|
|
Former
|
65.3 (367)
|
67.7 (398)
|
59.6 (337)
|
58.5 (335)
|
|
Never
|
25.6 (144)
|
23.8 (140)
|
29.0 (164)
|
27.7 (159)
|
|
Physical activity: inactive,
% (n)
|
43.6 (248)
|
36.0 (170)
|
27.1 (154)
|
24.1 (140)
|
0.03
|
Social class, % (n)
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
Nonmanual
|
58.4 (330)
|
56.6 (328)
|
59.5 (331)
|
54.1 (305)
|
|
Manual
|
40.6 (226)
|
43.4 (252)
|
40.5 (225)
|
45.9 (259)
|
|
Education level, %
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
No
qualification
|
39.7 (226)
|
40.8 (243)
|
39.4 (224)
|
38.2 (222)
|
|
Completed
school
|
49.5 (281)
|
47.7 (284)
|
48.1 (273)
|
50.9 (296)
|
|
Completed
university
|
10.9 (62)
|
11.4 (68)
|
12.5 (71)
|
10.8 (63)
|
|
|
Quartile Groups of Testosterone
|
1 <12.5 nmol/L (n=569)
|
2 12.5–15.6 nmol/L (n=595)
|
3 15.7–19.6 nmol/L (n=568)
|
4 >19.6 nmol/L (n=582)
|
P for Trend
|
SHBG indicates sex
hormone binding globulin; DHEAS, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.
|
Values are mean
(SD). Continuous variables were compared by ANOVA and categorical values with
the χ2 test.
|
*Exact numbers may
vary slightly because of missing data for some variables. n=2314 for
testosterone, n=2287 with cholesterol; n=2172 with LDL and HDL cholesterol.
|
Note Tables 3 is
available at http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/116/23/2694/T4.expansion.html
Table 3 shows the distribution of men who
died and
control subjects by quartile group of serum testosterone. Age-adjusted OR for
mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease,
and cancer decreased significantly with increasing quartile group of
testosterone and strengthened slightly after multivariable adjustment for other
hormones and for covariates. For total mortality, the ORs (95% confidence
intervals [CIs]) for increasing quartiles of endogenous total testosterone
compared with the lowest quartile were 0.75 (0.55 to 1.00), 0.62 (0.45 to
0.84), and 0.59 (0.42 to 0.85), respectively, after adjustment for age, date of
visit, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, blood cholesterol, cigarette
smoking, physical activity, alcohol intake, diabetes mellitus, history of
hypertension, history of high blood cholesterol, social class, education level,
dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstanediol glucuronide, and sex hormone
binding globulin.
Note
Table 4 is available at http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/116/23/2694/T4.expansion.html
Table 4 shows the multivariable relationship
of
testosterone modeled as a continuous variable with mortality due to all causes,
cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, and cancer and after the
exclusion of those who died within 2 years. For every 6-nmol/L increase in
serum testosterone (≈1 SD), there was a 14% lower risk of mortality (OR 0.86,
95% CI 0.79 to 0.94, P<0.001). The
magnitude of effect was similar for deaths due to cardiovascular causes and
those due to cancer and was little changed after adjustment for cardiovascular
risk factors and sex hormone binding globulin or after the exclusion of deaths
within 2 years. Inclusion of LDL and HDL cholesterol or triglycerides in the
model in place of total cholesterol did not substantially alter the findings,
and these associations were also consistent in subgroups that were stratified
by body mass index and by smoking (not shown). In analyses stratified by age
<65 years and ≥65 years, the multivariable-adjusted ORs for total mortality
for every 6-nmol/L increase in serum testosterone were 0.95 (95% CI 0.85 to
1.20, P=0.63) in men <65 years old
(206 case subjects and 427 control subjects) and 0.79 (0.68 to 0.92, P=0.002)
in men ≥65 years old (619 case subjects and 1062 control subjects). The
age-testosterone interaction term was not significant (P=0.10). The
findings were similar when testosterone–sex hormone binding globulin ratio was
used instead of total testosterone in analyses (data not shown).
Figure
is available at http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/116/23/2694/F1.expansion.html
The Figure shows survival curves by quartile
of
testosterone with the Cox regression model. These curves must be interpreted
with caution, because they were based on a nested case-control rather than
cohort analysis. Nevertheless, the results are consistent with ORs estimated on
the basis of logistic regression.
Discussion
In the present
study population of men,
increasing endogenous testosterone concentrations appeared to be inversely
related to mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular causes, and cancer, with
≈25% to 30% lower risk of total mortality in the highest compared with the
lowest quartile of testosterone level. A 1-SD increase in testosterone level
was associated with an ≈14% lower risk of total mortality. Testosterone
concentrations were significantly associated with several cardiovascular risk
factors, including HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, body mass index, and diabetes
prevalence, in an apparently beneficial direction and with total cholesterol
and LDL cholesterol in an unfavorable direction. However, the relationship with
mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer was still
present after adjustment for other hormones, sex hormone binding globulin, and
cardiovascular risk factors that included age, body mass index or waist-hip
ratio, systolic blood pressure, lipid profile, diabetes status, history of
hypertension, history of high blood cholesterol, social class, education
status, alcohol intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking habit.
The
relationship between endogenous testosterone and cardiovascular disease has
been reviewed extensively elsewhere.16,29,30 In general, most cross-sectional studies have reported higher
endogenous testosterone concentrations associated with more favorable
cardiovascular disease risk factor profiles, including higher HDL cholesterol
and lower triglyceride concentrations, blood glucose, blood pressure, and body
mass index. Nevertheless, several cross-sectional and prospective studies have
found no significant relationships between endogenous testosterone
concentrations and cardiovascular disease events, although the trend has been
generally in an inverse association. Cauley et al,18 in a 6- to 8-year follow-up of men in
the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Study, reported that testosterone
concentrations in 163 men who had a coronary event were not significantly
different from those in 163 age-matched control subjects. The Honolulu Heart
Study reported no difference in testosterone concentrations in 96 men who had
heart disease after 20 years’ follow-up compared with 96 control subjects.19 The Rancho Bernardo Study reported 114 cardiovascular and 82
coronary heart disease deaths in 872 men who were 40 to 79 years of age without
baseline cardiovascular disease who were followed up for 12 years; mean
testosterone concentrations did not differ in those who subsequently did or did
not experience an event.20 Contoreggi et al21 reported no difference in 46 men who developed coronary artery
disease compared with 124 men who did not after 9.5 years of follow-up. The
Caerphilly Study followed up 2512 men 45 to 59 years old for 5 years; 153 men
who experienced an ischemic heart disease event had concentrations of plasma
testosterone at baseline similar to those of the rest of the cohort.22 In a twin study of 566 participants, there were no significant
differences between hormone concentrations in participants with and without
prevalent (n=78) or incident (n=154) coronary heart disease.23 More recently, a study from Framingham reported serum
testosterone was not significantly associated with incident cardiovascular
disease in a 10-year follow-up of 2084 men who experienced 386 events.24
The
lack of significant associations of testosterone with cardiovascular events in
prospective studies has been variously attributed to measurement error in the
characterization of testosterone concentrations in individuals with only 1
blood sample and methodological issues that surround the assay of testosterone
or the stability of frozen samples.31 These measurement issues, together with the limited size of the
studies to date, mean that these studies were limited in statistical power
either to detect or to exclude a moderate relationship with cardiovascular
events.
Nevertheless,
there is supportive evidence from studies examining the relationship between
endogenous testosterone and atherosclerosis that suggests a mechanism through
which testosterone may relate to cardiovascular end points. Phillips et al32 reported the first study of a strong inverse correlation between
free testosterone and degree of coronary artery disease in 55 men undergoing
angiography without a history of myocardial infarction. Subsequent studies
reported a similar inverse relationship cross-sectionally with carotid
atherosclerosis33 and also with progression of atherosclerosis in the aorta34 and carotid artery.35
Although
testosterone supplementation studies have been conducted, their relevance to
interpretation of the data on endogenous hormone concentrations and
cardiovascular disease in the general population are limited, because many were
not properly randomized or blinded, were conducted in highly selected patient
groups, or used pharmacological doses of testosterone, and none had
cardiovascular disease end points. Some supplementation studies have reported
beneficial effects of oral testosterone undecanoate therapy or intravenous
administration on symptomatic angina pectoris, ECG patterns, and cardiovascular
function,36,37
In
the present cohort, we found both potentially beneficial and adverse
relationships of endogenous testosterone concentrations with these classic risk
factors, but the relationship with cardiovascular disease was unchanged after
adjustment for these factors, which indicates that if a protective
cardiovascular effect exists, it does not appear to be mediated through them.38 Higher testosterone has been associated with lower
concentrations of inflammatory markers, insulin, and hemostatic factors,39–42 measures that were not available in the present cohort, and it
is possible that any protective cardiovascular effect may act through these
mechanisms or through improved endothelial function and coronary
vasodilatation.43,44
Suppression
of testosterone concentrations leads to regression of prostate cancer,45 which leads to the concern that high testosterone concentrations
might be a risk factor for prostate and other male reproductive cancers;
however, prospective studies or supplementation studies, reviewed elsewhere,5,25 have not reported significant relationships of endogenous
testosterone concentrations or of testosterone supplementation with prostate
cancer. Although in the present analysis, there was insufficient power to
examine the relationships with prostate or other specific cancers, we observed
an inverse relationship of endogenous testosterone concentrations with cancer
mortality.
The
present study had limitations. Only a single, nonfasting blood sample was used
to characterize individuals with respect to testosterone status. This may have
resulted in considerable random measurement error because of high
intraindividual variation in testosterone with seasonal, diurnal, and episodic
variation. Nevertheless, a single measure is reported to be adequate for
population studies25,31; in any case, random
variation is likely to attenuate rather than produce spurious relationships.
It is possible
that testosterone
concentrations may be low in men who are already ill and more likely to die
during follow-up. Men with known serious chronic disease, namely, cancer, heart
disease, and stroke, were excluded from the present analyses. This was based on
self-report, and it is possible that there were still men with subclinical
disease included. Nevertheless, the relationships were also consistent after
the exclusion of all those who died within 2 years of the baseline, who may
have had had preclinical illness. Although we cannot exclude residual
confounding from other factors not measured here, these findings are consistent
with existing evidence from epidemiological and clinical studies indicating
that endogenous testosterone concentrations may be an indicator of good health.
Of course, generalizability of results from the present study is limited to
men; furthermore, the generalizability of these findings to other ethnic groups
is unknown.
The
present study suggests that high endogenous testosterone concentrations appear
to be beneficially associated with mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular
disease, and cancer. These findings require replication in other population
studies. The Women’s Health Initiative46 and the Hormone and Estrogen Replacement Study,47 which found adverse effects of
estrogen and progestin replacement therapy in women, emphasize the necessity
for end-point trials. Paradoxically, although many men are already using
testosterone supplementation, concern about increased cancer risk has been one
reason trials have not been conducted in this area. We concur with the
conclusions from recent reviews that although the data appear reassuring,
definitive assessment of the long-term effects of testosterone replacement
therapy on health will require large-scale controlled trials.3,5,48 Data from the present study may encourage consideration of
further research into the role of testosterone in health in men.
Previous SectionNext Section
Acknowledgments
Sources of Funding
EPIC-Norfolk
is supported by the Medical Research Council United
Kingdom, Cancer Research United Kingdom, Research into Ageing, Stroke
Association, British Heart Foundation, and The Academy of Medical Sciences.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
CLINICAL
PERSPECTIVE
The role of
testosterone in men’s health is still controversial. High doses of exogenous
testosterone or other anabolic steroids have been associated with adverse
health effects, including sudden cardiac death and liver disease, but
hypogonadism in men is also adversely associated with health. Surprisingly, the
relationship between endogenous testosterone concentrations within the
physiological range and overall health in men is still not well established. A
10-year prospective study in men aged 40 to 79 years
now reports that higher endogenous testosterone is associated with lower
subsequent mortality from all causes. Men in
the top quartile for endogenous testosterone concentrations had ≈40% lower risk
of death due to any cause than men in the bottom quartile, and this
relationship appeared independent of age, body mass index, smoking and other
lifestyle factors, cardiovascular risk factors, and other hormone levels.
These findings require replication in other population studies, and the lessons
from postmenopausal hormone therapy in women emphasize the necessity for
end-point trials. Paradoxically, although many men are already using
testosterone supplementation, concern about increased cancer risk has been one
reason trials have not been conducted. Although data appear reassuring,
definitive assessment of the long-term effects of testosterone replacement
therapy on health will require large-scale controlled trials. In the interim,
endogenous testosterone appears to be a predictor of health in men, and these
findings highlight the need for further research into the role of testosterone
in health in men.
References
1.
↵
Bagatell
CJ, Bremner WJ. Androgens in men: uses and abuses. N Engl J Med.1996; 334: 707–714.
CrossRefMedline
2.
↵
Gruenewald
DA, Matsumoto AM. Testosterone supplementation
therapy for older men: potential benefits and risks. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51: 101–115.
CrossRefMedline
3.
↵
Rhoden
EL, Morgentaler A. Risks of testosterone-replacement
therapy and recommendations for monitoring. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 482–492.
CrossRefMedline
4.
↵
Westaby
D, Ogle SJ, Paradinas FJ, Randell JB, Murray-Lyon
IM. Liver damage from long-term methyltestosterone. Lancet. 1977; 2: 262–263.
Medline
5.
↵
Liverman
CT, Blazer DG, eds. Testosterone and Aging.
Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press; 2004.
6.
↵
Kaufman
JM, Vermeulen A. The decline of androgen levels in
elderly men and its clinical and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2005; 26: 833–876.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
7.
↵
Nair
KS, Rizza RA, O’Brien P, Dhatariya K, Short KR, Nehra
A, Vittone JL, Klee GG, Basu A, Basu R, Cobelli C, Toffolo G, Dalla MC, Tindall
DJ, Melton LJ III, Smith GE, Khosla S, Jensen MD. DHEA in elderly women and
DHEA or testosterone in elderly men. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1647–1659.
CrossRefMedline
8.
↵
Page
ST, Matsumoto AM, Bremner WJ. DHEA and testosterone in
the elderly.N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 635–636.
CrossRefMedline
9.
↵
Ding
EL, Song Y, Malik VS, Liu S. Sex differences of
endogenous sex hormones and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and
meta-analysis.JAMA. 2006; 295: 1288–1299.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
10.
↵
Gyllenborg
J, Rasmussen SL, Borch-Johnsen K, Heitmann B,
Skakkebaek NE, Juul A. Cardiovascular risk factors in men: the role of gonadal
steroids and sex hormone-binding globulin. Metabolism. 2001; 50: 882–888.
CrossRefMedline
11.
↵
Haffner
SM, Katz MS, Stern MP, Dunn JF. The relationship of
sex hormones to hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. Metabolism. 1988; 37: 683–688.
CrossRefMedline
12.
↵
Haffner
SM, Shaten J, Stern MP, Smith GD, Kuller L; MRFIT
Research Group, Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Low levels of sex
hormone-binding globulin and testosterone predict the development of
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in men. Am J Epidemiol. 1996; 143: 889–897.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
13.
↵
Khaw
KT, Barrett-Connor E. Blood pressure and endogenous
testosterone in men: an inverse relationship. J Hypertens. 1988; 6: 329–332.
Medline
14.
↵
Khaw
KT, Barrett-Connor E. Endogenous sex hormones, high
density lipoprotein cholesterol, and other lipoprotein fractions in men. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991; 11: 489–494.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
15.
↵
Lichtenstein
MJ, Yarnell JW, Elwood PC, Beswick AD, Sweetnam
PM, Marks V, Teale D, Riad-Fahmy D. Sex hormones, insulin, lipids, and
prevalent ischemic heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1987; 126: 647–657.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
16.
↵
Muller
M, van der Schouw YT, Thijssen JH, Grobbee DE,
Lamberts SW, van der Schouw YT. Endogenous sex hormones and cardiovascular
disease in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88: 5076–5086.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
17.
↵
Simon
D, Charles MA, Nahoul K, Orssaud G, Kremski J, Hully
V, Joubert E, Papoz L, Eschwege E. Association between plasma total
testosterone and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy adult men: the Telecom
Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997; 82: 682–685.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
18.
↵
Cauley
JA, Gutai JP, Kuller LH, Dai WS. Usefulness of sex
steroid hormone levels in predicting coronary artery disease in men. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 60:771–777.
CrossRefMedline
19.
↵
Phillips
GB, Yano K, Stemmermann GN. Serum sex hormone
levels and myocardial infarction in the Honolulu Heart Program: pitfalls in
prospective studies on sex hormones. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988; 41: 1151–1156.
CrossRefMedline
20.
↵
Barrett-Connor
E, Khaw KT. Endogenous sex hormones and
cardiovascular disease in men: a prospective population-based study. Circulation. 1988; 78:539–545.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
21.
↵
Contoreggi
CS, Blackman MR, Andres R, Muller DC, Lakatta EG,
Felg JL, Harman SM. Plasma levels of estradiol, testosterone, and DHEAS do not
predict risk of coronary artery disease in men. J Androl. 1990; 11: 460–470.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
22.
↵
Yarnell
JW, Beswick AD, Sweetnam PM, Riad-Fahmy D.
Endogenous sex hormones and ischemic heart disease in men: the Caerphilly
prospective study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993; 13: 517–520.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
23.
↵
Mikulec
KH, Holloway L, Krasnow RE, Javitz H, Swan GE, Reed
T, Marcus R, Carmelli D. Relationship of endogenous sex hormones to coronary
heart disease: a twin study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 1240–1245.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
24.
↵
Arnlov
J, Pencina MJ, Amin S, Nam BH, Benjamin EJ, Murabito
JM, Wang TJ, Knapp PE, D’Agostino RB Sr, Bhasin S, Vasan RS. Endogenous sex hormones
and cardiovascular disease incidence in men. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 145:176–184.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
25.
↵
Eaton
NE, Reeves GK, Appleby PN, Key TJ. Endogenous sex
hormones and prostate cancer: a quantitative review of prospective studies. Br J Cancer.1999; 80: 930–934.
CrossRefMedline
26.
↵
Day
N, Oakes S, Luben R, Khaw KT, Bingham S, Welch A,
Wareham N. EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort:
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999; 80 (suppl 1): 95–103.
Medline
27.
↵
Khaw
KT, Jakes R, Bingham S, Welch A, Luben R, Day N,
Wareham N. Work and leisure time physical activity assessed using a simple,
pragmatic, validated questionnaire and incident cardiovascular disease and
all-cause mortality in men and women: the European Prospective Investigation
into Cancer in Norfolk prospective population study. Int J Epidemiol. 2006; 35:1034–1043.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
28.
↵
Wareham
NJ, Jakes RW, Rennie KL, Schuit J, Mitchell J,
Hennings S, Day NE. Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from
the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective
Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Public Health Nutr. 2003; 6: 407–413.
CrossRefMedline
29.
↵
Liu
PY, Death AK, Handelsman DJ. Androgens and
cardiovascular disease.Endocr Rev. 2003; 24: 313–340.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
30.
↵
Wu
FC, von Eckardstein A. Androgens and coronary artery
disease. Endocr Rev. 2003; 24: 183–217.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
31.
↵
Vermeulen
A, Verdonck G. Representativeness of a single
point plasma testosterone level for the long term hormonal milieu in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992; 74: 939–942.
Abstract
32.
↵
Phillips
GB, Pinkernell BH, Jing TY. The association of
hypotestosteronemia with coronary artery disease in men. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994; 14: 701–706.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
33.
↵
van
den Beld AW, Bots ML, Janssen JA, Pols HA, Lamberts SW,
Grobbee DE. Endogenous hormones and carotid atherosclerosis in elderly men. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157: 25–31.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
34.
↵
Hak
AE, Witteman JC, de Jong FH, Geerlings MI, Hofman A,
Pols HA. Low levels of endogenous androgens increase the risk of
atherosclerosis in elderly men: the Rotterdam study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87: 3632–3639.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
35.
↵
Muller
M, van den Beld AW, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Lamberts SW,
van der Schouw YT. Endogenous sex hormones and progression of carotid atherosclerosis
in elderly men. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2074–2079.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
36.
↵
English
KM, Steeds RP, Jones TH, Diver MJ, Channer KS.
Low-dose transdermal testosterone therapy improves angina threshold in men with
chronic stable angina: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Circulation. 2000; 102: 1906–1911.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
37.
↵
Webb
CM, Adamson DL, de Zeigler D, Collins P. Effect of
acute testosterone on myocardial ischemia in men with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83: 437–439, A9.
CrossRefMedline
38.
↵
Phillips
GB, Pinkernell BH, Jing TY. Are major risk factors
for myocardial infarction the major predictors of degree of coronary artery disease
in men?Metabolism. 2004; 53: 324–329.
CrossRefMedline
39.
↵
Haffner
SM. Sex hormone-binding protein, hyperinsulinemia,
insulin resistance and noninsulin-dependent diabetes. Horm Res. 1996; 45: 233–237.
Medline
40.
↵
Laaksonen
DE, Niskanen L, Punnonen K, Nyyssonen K, Tuomainen
TP, Salonen R, Rauramaa R, Salonen JT. Sex hormones, inflammation and the
metabolic syndrome: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003; 149:601–608.
Abstract
41.
↵
Phillips
GB. Relationship between serum sex hormones and
glucose, insulin and lipid abnormalities in men with myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977; 74: 1729–1733.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
42.
↵
Phillips
GB, Jing TY, Resnick LM, Barbagallo M, Laragh JH,
Sealey JE. Sex hormones and hemostatic risk factors for coronary heart disease
in men with hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993; 11: 699–702.
CrossRefMedline
43.
↵
Jones
RD, Pugh PJ, Jones TH, Channer KS. The vasodilatory
action of testosterone: a potassium-channel opening or a calcium antagonistic
action?Br J Pharmacol. 2003; 138: 733–744.
CrossRefMedline
44.
↵
Webb
CM, McNeill JG, Hayward CS, de Zeigler D, Collins P.
Effects of testosterone on coronary vasomotor regulation in men with coronary
heart disease. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1690–1696.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
45.
↵
Huggins
C, Hodges CV. Studies on prostatic cancer, I: the
effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum
phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate: 1941. J Urol. 2002; 168: 9–12.
CrossRefMedline
46.
↵
Rossouw
JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg
C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM,
Ockene J. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy
postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative
randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288: 321–333.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
47.
↵
Hulley
S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B,
Vittinghoff E; Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research
Group. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of
coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. JAMA. 1998; 280: 605–613.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
48.
↵
Barrett-Connor
E, Bhasin S. Time for (more research on)
testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89: 501–502.
FREE Full Text