|
MALE HORMONES
|
TESTOSTERONE 2-page summation
|
|
|
§ HRT men, Testosterone Benefits--3 pages (12/3/16) http://healthfully.org/rc/id7.html
The state of medical science is worse than imagined. For exposes on bad pharma read, Marketing
Science, Side Effects, and Junk treatments . Testosterone (TTT) usage has come under attack by pharma
and the FDA for the sake of pharma profits.
The FDA issued a black-box warning for TTT exposure of children by contact
with a user. Pharma’s attacks TTT (which is not patented) for causing aggressive prostate cancer
and Cardio-Vascular Disease (CDV); both are not just false, the opposite is true--see next page. Keeping the youthful- level of TTT
has major health benefits for both men past 60 and women past 50. The testicles produce 95% of the TTT, about 5 mg/day & about 50 to
100 mcg of dihydrotestosterone (DHT)
and estradiol. In women TTT is synthesized
by the corpus luteum (adjacent to the ovaries) and the adrenal cortex--TTT’s
level is about 1/7th of a man’s, and it is more bioactive. TTT is 60% bonded to a plasma protein, 38% to albumin, and 2% free. DHT and TTT are
androgens and thus build muscle mass. DHT is 3-5 times more potent than testosterone or other androgens (except
in skeletal muscle tissue, where testosterone is the main androgen). TTT & DHT freely enters
target cells and binds to intracellular receptors which then bind to DNA promoting gene transcription. DHT is more active at these sites. DHT is necessary in early development for enlargement of the
prostate, penis, and hair growth at the time of puberty. The pituitary gland secretes LH and FSH; they act on the testes to stimulate the production
of sperm and TTT. Estrogen (estradiol) is a vital component of
the male physiology, and in fact is made from TTT. Estrogen decreases
LH production and thus TTT. The normal range for TTT is 13
- 40 nmol/L (370 - 1100 ng/dL), and for estradiol is 55 -165 pmol (10 - 30 ng/dL)--the first is the high levels for 80-year
old man followed high level for a 20-year old. “Although, this doesn't automatically mean that a young man with 380 ng/dL has the same amount of testosterone
of an 80+ year old, since there is usually a big difference in SHBG levels in the bloodstream between young and elderly, resulting
in a much higher free testosterone level in the young. …” Wiki, and bioactivity of TTT is more. Normal TTT has declined over30% in the last 100 years, reason unknown—JK guess is hormone mimics possible from
soy products whose usage has steadily increased since 1900.
Noticeable improvements with topical
testosterone, timeline to significant
improvement—(Eur
J Endocrinol. 2011, Nov. 675-85)
Sexual interest
6 weeks
Erection/ejaculation
26 weeks
Quality of life
4+ weeks
Depressed mood
30 weeks
Erythropoiesis-red cells 52 weeks
Lipid profile 52 weeks
Insulin sensitivity
52 weeks
Muscle strength
16 weeks
Reduced fat mass
16 weeks
Reduced inflammation 12
weeks Bone mass detectable at 26 weeks (versus gradual erosion, prevents osteoporosis). Same benefits findings at.
Cognitive Function: “Several observations suggest that testosterone is also capable
of modulating neural systems in adult animals. For example, androgen treatment prevents N-methyl- D-aspartate (NMDA)
excite-toxicity in hippocampal neurons12 and may facilitate recovery after injury by promoting fiber outgrowth
and sprouting.13 Administration of TTT increases nerve growth factor (NGF) levels in the hippocampus, and induces an upregulation of NGF receptors
in the forebrain. TTT was protective
of human primary neurons in culture, providing the most direct evidence for neuro-protective effects of TTT on human neural tissue”(Moffat), widely supported. Equivocal finding
are because of the study’s design. TTT
reduces the rate of age-related cognitive
decline.
Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s
Diseases: “Beta
amyloid accumulation in the brain is the physical manifestation for AD. TTT decreases amyloid secretion from rat cortical neurons15
and reduces amyloid-induced neurotoxicity in cultured hippocampal neurons”16 Moffat. “TTT reduces neuronal secretion of Alzheimer's β-amyloid [Aβ] peptides.” Based on in vitro study a decrease in Aβ release was
observed.
“[L]long-term testosterone concentrations in individuals
prior to the diagnosis of dementia.… The results of this study revealed an approximate 10% reduction in the risk for
AD for each unit increase in free testosterone. Moffat; a 26% decrease for each 10-nmol FTI increase. at and, at, and. Method through Modifying APOE genotype and BRACE1. Parkinson’s Disease, TTT improves function, patient deficiency.
Strength-weight (improved lean body mass
to fat ratio) and obesity: Study shows that 65 years of age men lost 3 kg of fat while gaining 1.9
kg of muscle mass over a 36 month period. “After 3 months
of TTT treatment, lean body mass was significantly increased”,… Muscle adaptation
to exercise is strongly influenced by anabolic endocrine hormones … whereas TTT and locally expressed IGF-I have been reported to activate muscle stem cells. Several
studies have reported … maximal voluntary strength in healthy older men.” “It is known that plasma total testosterone (T) is decreased
in obese men in proportion to the degree of obesity,”
Osteoporosis & bone density:
“The most significant increase in BMD [bone mass density] was seen during the first year of TTT
treatment in previously untreated patients, when
BMD increased from 95.2 ± 5.9 to 120.0 ± 6.1 mg/cm3 hydroxyapatite (mean ± SE). Long term
TTT treatment maintained BMD in the age-dependent reference range in all 72 hypogonadal men….” Protects against rheumatoid arthritis. Low TTT associated with RH. TTT
encourages bone marrow stimulation and reversing the effects of anemia.
CVD, Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) , atherogenesis,
MI, high cholesterol, obesity, thrombosis: Numerous studies link obesity to low TTT, and genesis of morbid obesity, at, and hypertension. TTT treatment
results in weight loss, at. “Emerging evidence suggests that testosterone therapy may be able to reverse some aspects of metabolic syndrome” metastudy. And another: “These results suggest that low SHBG [sex hormone-binding globulin] and/or AD [androgen
deficiency, TTT] may provide early warning signs for cardiovascular risk and an
opportunity for early intervention in non-obese men.” In
a matched study followed ten years published by the AHA found that the lowest quarter
of men were 41% more likely to die from cancer and cardiovascular disease compared to the highest quarter. Low TTT is associated with cardiovascular disease. TTT Inhibits atherogenesis: in a survey paper, “Positive
correlation between total or free testosterone level and HDL and a negative association the LDL” and. Conclusion: “A normal
physiological level of TTT in men protects against the development of high cholesterol,
insulin resistance, hypertensions, clots that cause heart attacks, obesity, and
increased waist:hip ratio, all of which predispose to the development of CVD. Low
or low normal TTT is implicated in the pathogenesis of acute MI and acute stroke. The decline of TTT with age may explain
the greater risk of CVD with advancing years” and [medical terminology simplified by jk]. A literature-review study confirms TTT positive effects upon vascular functions--2012. After controlling
for factors low TTT associated with MI, positive effect upon fibrinolytic pathway, reduces angina. Current claims counter this are based
on recent marketing studies, and a July 2014 Lancet article contradicts those findings.
TTT is good for your heart (2013 review) & health, but not for pharma.
Vascular aging slowed: TTT is good for endothelial cells, the gate keepers in the artery walls thus preventing CVD Campelo et al., 2012, and Foresta et al., 2008 . Lowers blood pressure a causal factor for CVD through nitrous oxide production Yue et al., 1995 and Nguyen et al., 2011 reduces
arterial stiffness Yaron et al., 2009. Promotes production
of prostaglandins, thus interfere with vascular function via changes in the thromboxane/COX pathway Cheuk et al., 2000; Song et al., 2004. For in depth summary article click on link.
Diabetes: Multiple studies
found that type-2 diabetes associated with low TTT, and lowest TTT doubles death rate at,
insulin role. After one year, TTT to exercise and diet 81% improved, vs 31% for those without
TTT, also, &.
Prostate
Cancer: Low levels of TTT are associated with
both higher risk and disease progression. “In our study patients with prostate
cancer and low free TTT had more extensive disease”, also, also. “This finding suggests that low serum free TTT may be
a marker for more aggressive disease.” This evidence calls to question
chemical castration for prostate cancer.
The theory that TTT regulates in later life the growth of the prostate
organ is without valid support. Like
the penis, the window for growth closes after puberty. Both organs is a result
of DHT not TTT. Moreover TTT is
only essential for prostatic secretion; not its growth. Harvard Medical School
and Prof. Abraham Morgentaler MD, Testosterone
for Life, p. 115-139 reviews the source (Dr. Huggins). They found the
work junk science, and not supported by subsequent journal articles. Very low
TTT from castration slows the rate of growth and giving a supplement subsequently stimulates growth. Only those who had very low testosterone, such as those who aa part of the treatment for prostate cancer
experience this effect. However, for those with normal TTT supplement doesn’t
accelerate growth. Huggins and latter Fowler and Whitmore demonstrated what Prof.
Mogentaler calls “testosterone flare”
P. 129-131. A study measure TTT in the prostates showed that with normal level
the prostate dose not adsorb more. It is like thirst, once enough more TTT isn’t adsorb.
That is why though TTT supplement for those with normal level don’t experience an accelerated rate of prostate
cancer growth. In fact those with high serum TTT are at significantly lower risk.
The use of TTT in all men as it declines with age below 450 ng/dL, would lower cancer risk,
Sarcopenia refers to the loss of skeletal muscle
mass with age and is associated with low levels of TTT. “We have found a
prevalence of sarcopenia of 22.6% in older
postmenopausal women not receiving
estrogen.” TTT prevents and
reverses sarcopenia in men and
women through the simulation of the growth differentiation factor myostatin.
Mood elevation and quality of life & sexual performance: with all these
positive effects both quality of life and mood elevation
improve. DHT & its metabolites
have powerful
euphoriant, libido, anti-anxiety, & antidepressant effects. As stated before benefits are dose related, and they come on slowly over a period of one year. It is NOT a coincidence that as the TTT level drops with age that numerous age-related conditions develop and the quality of life decreases. Sexual performance and drive improves
mainly because of increased strength, endurance, & mental alertness, i.e.,
general well being. Quality study
at 18 years found the lowest 1/3rd had a 33% greater death rate. At
youthful level TTT dramatically improves health,
quality, and duration of life.
Testosterone and longevity, while the literature fails to address this question in population
studies, and is nearly void on the effects of restoring in the elderly their TTT level to that of range for a 20-year old;
but given the above benefits, including increased energy (drive) for physical exertion it is reasonable to conclude guestimate
at least a 4 year extension in life. A look at elderly weight lifters (obviously
on androgens confirms this conclusion.
TTT for women: Cognitive function: “Effects of testosterone on visual-spatial performance has been suggested by enhanced performance
in females exposed prenatally to excess androgens. Women
with higher scores on mental status had significantly higher total and bio-available testosterone levels.” (Moffat). In a study of women 55-88 years of age, those with the higher levels of TTT adjusted for age performed significantly better.
Sexual desire: “Compared with placebo, women receiving the 300-µg/dL testosterone patch had significantly greater increases from baseline
in sexual desire (67% vs 48%; P = .05) and in
frequency of satisfying sexual activity (79% vs 43%; P = .049).” Vaginal estrogen creams
and TTT
reverse vaginal atrophy. Mood elevation: “The positive-well-being, depressed-mood, and composite scores of the Psychological General Well-Being
Index also improved at the higher dose”. Concern over masculinization is misplaced:
the dose is insufficient and dihydrotestosterone (not TTT) is responsible for masculinization. Women body builders use a very high dose of androgens.
Third reason in the 80’s and 90’s there was widely marketed, mainly in Europe, a formulation of HRT with
TTT (instead of progestin), still sold in the US as Estratest. TTT patch for women is available. See the 3 pages on HRT for list of benefits, especially for natural HRT of estradiol and progesterone.
RECOMMENDATIONS: Since
2003 JK have used TTT 1/2 tsp 10% (60 grams/month) lotion from a compounding pharmacy--increased
to 15% when I reached 68 years—necessitated by the lower bioactivity as TTT
receptors age and SHBG drops. JK is taking 4 times the highest dose available
in patented formulas, and made even higher by improved absorption. Only about
10% of topical TTT passes through the skin, thus 100 mg is equal to a 10mg injection. Apply widely as possible over the torso, back, shoulders, underarms, and face using water and rubbing it in to promote
better absorption. For JK with the higher dose of 150 mg, leg cramping vanished, joint are excellent, and skin has
become much tougher on forearms. JK notices from 12 years of use: cognitive benefits, increased energy,
feeling well, resistance to weight gain, improved muscle tone, tight abs, moderate increase in strength as to weight load
at the gym; looking younger has sexual/romantic benefits. JK’s TTT level averages the youthful 850 ng/dL, and his muscle tone reflects this.
Pharma
for financial reasons offers bio-ineffective doses. Some doctors make a career
out of hormone balancing. Recommended:
10% 1/2th tsp when TTT
level is below 450 ng/dL, increased to 15% at age 70--lotion from compounding pharmacy.
A
daily 325 mg of aspirin lowers the risk of prostate cancer and other cancers at least 30% through the
stimulation of the body’s necrosis factor for destruction of abnormal cells, at, and, and. In the feedback system,
adding TTT lowers testicular production of TTT
and also sperm count. See Morgentaler supra, 145-7 for discussion of this issues
including possible reduction in testicular size. Only oral form of TTT taken long-term poses risk of liver damage. The TTT patch can cause a skin rash. “Multiple studies of prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have failed to show that
the size of the prostate enlarges substantially with TTT therapy or causes a diminution
in urinary function,” Morgentaler supra 149. For above reasons high dose
lotion of TTT is highly recommended.
Pharma does marketing science to “show” e.g. that TTT doesn’t prevent CVD, insulin resistance, etc. by using too low a dose of TTT. For example a Mayo Clinic study used “transdermal testosterone patch (50 mg per day; D-TRANS, by
Alza (J&J). The 2 lead authors were opinion leaders for 5 pharma companies. JK, age 72, applies 150 mg TTT cream. Androgel 1.62, 2 pumps (30 days) = 40.5 mg/day for ~$420. When TTT therapy became popular, pharma attacked its usage. Trials that don’t obtain a serum level of 580 ng/dL have not produced a TTT level comparable to that of a 60 year old in 1920—see JECM 2007 –thus won’t show full benefits.
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Non-technical
summation
Testosterone: the male
hormone that is almost identical in structure to estrogen and thus has many of
the same benefits as estrogen. Noticeable benefits for testosterone: quality
of life in 4 weeks, depressed mood in 30 weeks, bone mass in 26 weeks,
lipid profile in 52, inflammation in 12
weeks, sexual interest in 6 weeks, erection/ejaculation in 26 weeks,
red cells in
52 weeks, insulin sensitivity in 52 weeks , muscle strength in 16 weeks,
fat mass in 16 weeks (Eur J Endocrinol. 2011). Other benefits include improved cognitive
function, reduced risk for Alzheimer’s disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetes,
cardiovascular disease and the resultant heart attacks and strokes.
The negative claims made for testosterone is
from pharma’s marketing science. It
is
not associated with higher cholesterol levels or prostate cancer, but rather
the reverse. “Testosterone
does
not cause or produce deleterious effects on prostate cancer” Wiki. Recommended: once serum cholesterol level
drops below 450, to use 100 mg of testosterone in a topical cream (10% ½ tsp.)
from compounding pharmacy. Commercial
preparations are too weak. Ideal
level is
850 to 1000 ng/dL, or higher. Increased
to 15% mg at age 70 as effects diminish--bio-receptors and response decreases
with age as does the level of free (available) testosterone.
Current assay methods are inaccurate
as to measure of free testosterone. Apply widely
as possible over the torso, back, shoulders, underarms, and face using
water and rubbing it in to promote better absorption. Doctors
who follow
a program of hormone balance are milking the insurance and patient.
GH, Growth hormone: Sometimes used with TTT. “On the other hand, most studies have
shown that administration of GH alone failed to improve muscle strength despite
amelioration of the detrimental somatic changes of aging. Both GH and TTT are
anabolic agents that promote muscle protein synthesis and hypertrophy but work
through separate mechanisms, and the combined administration of GH and TTT,
albeit in only a few studies, has resulted in greater efficacy than
either
hormone alone.” This is consistent with both
medical literature and belief held by body builders on “the
juice” (androgens & GH).
In 1998 I read the Rudman
study (published
in 1990 in NEJM) which showed significant short-term
benefits from HGH in the elderly (muscle mass up and weight down).
By the age of 55, HGH levels drop on an
average to 15% of youthful level. Since
then I read of major irregularities in the Rodman study, the worst of which was
listing only the 12 best of 50 in the treatment cohort. In the 6-month trial 27 dropped out. Both were irregularities were kept from the
NEJM peer reviewers. [Note the source
is
missing for the criticism of the negative critique of Rudman; viz. source of
subsequent actually size of study and 27 who dropped out was not including in
the Worst
Pill
article]. This negative critique of
the Rudman study is consistent with WP’s negative view on hormones and their
reliance upon the pro-pharma NIH. Thus
no confidence can be placed with Worst Pill’s pronouncements on hormones and by
extension upon HGH. WP also criticizes the Rudman study for the
lack of a placebo group to prevent bias; but bias is not possible with loss of
adipose tissue and increased muscle mass.
The attack on HGH appears to follow pharma’s pattern of opposing a
healthful drug. The literature is
too
thin to decide its merits; and injections often run over $10,000 annually.
HGH enhancers
are probably a scam. Thus healthfully
doesn’t make a recommendation concerning HGH. Testosterone
is proven healthful and is beneficial when the level falls to below 500 ng/dL.
Effects of high dose: JK has noticed the
difference after 6 months, first of mood elevation in 2002. In
2011 the dose was increased to 15% of 2 grams lotion in 2011—from prior
10%. JK felt better and muscle tone
improved, and joint pain vanished. It
was like 2002, except for sexual performance. His Canadian friend Danny had
tried Androgel, and after 4 month discontinued it in 2006, because he didn’t
notice a difference. In 2008 he
tired it
again, this time using 2 grams of 10% TTT lotion. Within 2 months, Danny was convinced of the
difference. He goes to the gym regular
and at the age of 68 has daily sex with long-term penetration.
. Precocious puberty from Wikipedia:
TTT is made both by girls and boys,
pre-puberty. The FDA used 8 cases of reported aggression or genitalia
enlargement as the reason for the black-box warning. There was no
laboratory investigation to prove that those events were caused by father who
applied topical TTT. No proof was sought by the FDA, just anecdotal reports.
Precocious sexual
develop occurs in a small number of children. In my class in 3rd grade,
for example, one girl was developing breasts. Moreover, the
patch, the most commonly sold form of TTT, is covered and adheres to the skin,
thus contact by the child would not occur. Finally,
if the source is a lotion from a compounding pharmacy (under 10% of total
sales), then transfer through contact is possible. But very few fathers take
TTT, making such
transfer unlikely. Other relatives would
have too infrequent contact. And such
contact must be on the area applied, usually the underarm or chest. But prolonged
contact with these parts of the
body are high unlikely for a prepubescent boy. Moreover, casual contact would
not contribute appreciable to the level of TTT in the child. If the FDA wanted
to prove that transfer was
possible, they could easily construct a test with tagged TTT, and have 2nd
person rub against the person where the tagged TTT has been applied using a
topical lotion from a compounding pharmacy.
Then they would a day later take a blood sample and see what percentage
of TTT of total TTT is tagged. Without
testing the reports are not based on science.
The FDA simply relied upon 8 filings of reports the phenomena of either
aggression or genital enlargement in a prepubescent boy. The FDA made no effort
to separate cases to
investigate the causes of precocious puberty, which has numerous natural
causes. A search of www.scholar.google.com list many of such causes,
and at the
bottom of page two a case study that could have been from exposure to
testosterone, though no causal nexus was firmly
established, and the authors were
uncertain as to cause (published in an
obscure journal). Possible PhARMA was
instrumental in generating those reports filed with the FDA through PhARMA
friendly physicians. The FDA doesn’t
issue black-bow warnings for block-buster drug on anecdotal evidence. Another hatchet
job done by PhARMA’s and the FDA on TTT—business as usual.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Early menarche and male sexual maturity: A
point of
interest, and puzzle, has been not just the steady increase in height over the
last 2 centuries, but also the march toward younger age of menarche in women
and male sexual maturity, “In England, the average in 1840
was 16.5 years…. A 2006 study in Denmark found that puberty, as evidenced by
breast development, started at an average age of 9 years and 10 months, a year
earlier than when a similar study was done in 1991…. Early stages of male
hypothalamic maturation seem to be very similar to the early stages of female
puberty, though occurring about 1–2 years later.” see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puberty#Historical_shift.
Prostate
cancer and TTT: Contrary to accepted wisdom TTT is protective. It has been long assumed
that testosterone stimulates the growth of prostate cancer; just like estrogen
does for breast cancer. It
is standard treatment to prescribe a drug that blocks testosterone
(pharmaceutical castration), the equivalent is done to women with breast
cancer. This assumption is false. Numerous
studies have instead of finding a negative effect for TTT (& estradiol for
women) find a positive TTT relation of lower risk and less aggressive (see
article above for links). The reason
lies in the nature of cancer and the approval process. The FDA uses the surrogate
endpoint of
androgen blocking to assume benefit, without requiring long-term study to prove
effectiveness (the same for example has been done with statins for MI and death
from cardiovascular disease). The reason
given for not doing endpoint (death) placebo controlled studies is that it is
unethical to withhold treatment in the placebo group; but the benefit hasn’t
been proven. An extensive search has
failed to find proof in the older literature.
And there is strong evidence that low testosterone is causal for both
prostate cancer and aggressive prostate cancer (article supra). Moreover, lower
testosterone is associated
with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), a condition in which as the man ages
his prostate continues to grow. Old men
have low TTT, and as noted in Wikipedia “relatively low levels of serum testosterone are found in
patients with BPH.” More evidence that low TTT is a risk factor. For
metastatic cancer, the benefit has not been proven, and if not it chemical
castration is clearly contra-indicated, though pharma teaches otherwise. Like with
lung cancer and other types, if it is
aggressive, finding it early makes no difference. Removal of a stage 2-4 cancer
is the best
treatment. For stage 1, which truly
isn’t cancer by definition, wait and watch is the best course. Stage 1
is a benign tumor, not cancer, because
by definition it hasn’t invaded adjacent tissue. Pharma has blurred this
distinction.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Falling TTT Levels since 1900: The normal level of testosterone
for an 80 year old has steadily fallen since 1984 from 450 to under 250
in 2004. Three principle causes are
statins, polypharmacy (taking multiple drugs), & obesity. Moreover, estrogen
is known to reduce the
production of testosterone. There is an
assortment of evidence which show that estrogen mimics occupy estrogen
receptors and thereby cause both the reduction of the production of
testosterone and increase appetite (as though pregnant). Disconcerting is NIH
shift in standard for
low TTT and its affect upon medical practice.
The normal level for an 80 year old in 1984 (450 ng/dL), as high a
person aged 50 today, see Boston
study.
The current NIH’s
standard for low TTT is under200
ng/dL. “In the
meantime, truly hypogonadal men (those who are symptomatic men and have a serum
testosterone concentration below 200 ng/dL) who have no contraindications to
testosterone replacement therapy (e.g., prostate cancer) may benefit from
testosterone replacement regardless of whether they are 30 or 80 years of age.” Over and over again the record show that
NIH
acts in the interest of big PhARMA and contrary to the public’s health. The
negative position of NIH on testosterone
is one more example.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Junk
science: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa054629#t=articleTop
What is
normal now for a 65-year old was male in 1990 is lower in 2003 (515 compared to
just 430 ng/dL). Since1920, when
reliable figures became available, there has been a stead drop in TTT
level. A 80-year old’s level averaged 470
in 1919, and in 2003 380 ng/dL, at. Two sources of estrogen mimics as possible
causes are soy products and the bisphenols like softeners added to PVCs.
One example of such is a study in 2006 where eligible men
were over the age of 60 and had a “bioavailable levels that was less than 103
ng/dL (average 50 ng/dL). This is about 1/4th the level of an
80-year olds listed in JCEM article. And
the dose was just 5 mg transdermal; too low to produce significant
results. Average level at 2 years of
treatment was 75 ng/dL; still well below the 380 level (see tables). The NEJM
article found no changes at 2 years.
One letter published on article criticized the results because
“replacement administered failed to achieve physiologic testosterone levels”
and another for the lack of physical exercise which is needed to be part of
treatment to improve physical function compared to placebo group. The two lead
authors of this article are thought leaders who receive lecture grants from 5
major pharmaceutical companies—another hatchet job.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WARNINGS: METHYLTESTOSTERONE, testosterone cypionate,
and testosterone undecanoate used long term are associated with liver toxicity,
all of which are orally active. Estrogen
associated with lower level of TTT through inhibition effect. Soy bean has
estrogen mimic, which is possible the cause for the falling TTT levels over the
last 100 years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Androgel the leading product
comes in 1 and 1.672% dose. 20.25 mg
TTT/pump. Each pump dispenses 1.25 gm
gel. Comes in 75 gm container. 2
pumps would result in 2.5 gms = 30 day
supply which runs ~$425/month for 40.5 mg of TTT daily. JK was getting 200 mg/day
(10% of 2gm in 60
gm container) 200 mg of TTT, now raised to 300 mg of TTT.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Lowering the level for normal for elderly: a way to get the doctors to not write scripts
More tricks beside
black bock warning and association with prostate cancer: NIH states that between
300 and 200 is
borderline hypogonadal, while under 200 should be treated. However, the average
level for an 80 year old
is 370 ng/dL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2686341/ which
is a very good article but for several
such pro-pharma spins. At http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/92/1/196.full
Average
level of a 45 & 50 year old is
537, 60 years 517, and both 70 & 80 years
517 measured in 1987-89.
Inexplicable the levels dropped for the same group at intervals 1995-97
and 2002-04. The 50-year olds in 95-97
had level of485, the 60s at 476, and
the 70-80 at 471. However the 2002-04 showed a major
decline. The 60s at 436, the 70s
at 436, the 80s at 368.
Among causal factors is the increase in obesity and
polypharmacy over the course of follow-up. Counter is trend is a major
reduction in cigarette smoking. The
article noticed this: “Results were essentially
unchanged when all
covariate effects (see Subjects and Methods)
were included in multivariate. The chart
for 1919 shows the level to be 545 for an 80 year person. Plastic wear for foods
became popular in the
1970s. A number of sources find a connection to bisphenols and like compound
whose main source of exposure comes from food and water containers. “Bisphenol A is an endocrine disruptor which can mimic estrogen and has been shown to cause negative health effects in
animal studies.
More specifically, bisphenol A closely mimics the structure and function of the
hormone estradiol with the ability to bind to and activate the same estrogen
receptor as
the natural hormone… A 2011 rodent study found that male rats exposed to BPA
had lower sperm counts and testosterone levels than those of unexposed
males.” Wiki
At
http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/92/1/196.full http://jcem.endojournals.org/content/92/1/196.abstract
Massachusetts Male Aging Study (wave T1, T2, & T3) it
show those in 1987 to 1989, were over 2)% higher than the group tested in
1995-97; and T3 in 2002-2004 another drop of 20% mostly among those in the
75-80 age group. Thus in a 20 year
period the “normal (average) level of TTT dropped 40% among the elderly.
|
|
|
|
Enter supporting content here
|
|
|