A PREEMPTIVE
STRIKE AGAINST CANCER
The news that aspirin may cut risks
gives a big boost to a slew of promising drugs
DRUG COMPANIES ARE pouring billions of dollars into developing new targeted therapies for cancer, and so far
none are close to a cure. But there is a countervailing force to their quest: the search for widely available drugs that could
stop cancer from starting. Chemoprevention, as the field is called, just got a win with the news that aspirin, already used
to prevent heart disease, reduces the risk of the most common form of breast cancer. |
No one is ready to recommend that women start popping aspirin every day, in part because the drug can cause gastrointestinal
side effects.* But the report, in the May 26 issue of The Journal of the American
Medical Association, does raise the hope that women already taking aspirin to prevent heart disease may be getting another
valuable benefit. “I think this is a very important paper,” says Dr. Waun Ki Hong, a pioneer in chemoprevention
at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
Hong says a number of drugs have now been shown to suppress cancer, including aspirin and similar nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID5) such as ibuprofin. In fact, aspirin has already been proven effective in preventing colon
cancer. A stream of studies over the last few yeas has also focused on aspirin’s
potential against breast cancer, but with mixed results. The JAMA study by researchers
from Columbia University, is noteworthy because it shows which type of breast cancer would most likely be prevented—and
why.
DOWNSIDE
TO DAILY DOSES
THE
RESEARCHERS studied 3,000 Long Island women, half with breast cancer and half without, and analyzed how often they took aspirin, ibuprofen (such as Advil),
and acetaminophen (such as Tylenol). They found that 20.9% of the women with breast cancer had taken aspirin regularly
for six months or longer before they were diagnosed, compared with 24.3% of the women in the control group. That adds up
to a 20% lower risk of breast cancer for aspirin users vs. nonusers. The drug was most effective against tumors that are dependent** on the hormones estrogen and progesterone, reducing the risk of these
types of cancers by 26%. Hormone-dependent tumors account for 60% to 70% of all breast cancer cases. Ibuprofen had
a weaker effect, while acetaminophen, which is not an NSAID, offered no protection.
The Columbia scientists based their study on 10 years of lab research. They knew that aspirin blocks an enzyme in the blood
called COX-2 that stimulates estrogen production. Testing its effect in mice, Dr. Andrew J. Dannenberg of Weill-Cornell Medical College, a co-author of the JAMA report, found that aspirin reduced
both estrogen and breast tumors.
Still, cancer experts say the Columbia study wasn’t flawless. It only followed the women for a year,
and was retrospective—the outcomes were based on participants’ reports of their own behavior and open
to bias, a problem with many such studies. But more money is being poured into prospective trials, which give a drug to a
large population over a number of years to see what happens. The National Cancer Institute is conducting a seven-year
trial with 22,000 women to see whether tamoxifen, a breast cancer treatment, or Eli Lilly & Co.’s Evista,
an osteoporosis drug, is better able to prevent breast cancer. Results are due in 2006.
The NCI says there are more than 40 other drugs in chemoprevention trials, ranging from old standbys like
aspirin to new targeted therapies such as AstraZeneca PLC’S Iressa, a lung cancer treatment approved in 2003. M.D.
Anderson doctors are testing Iressa and Tarceva, a similar drug by Genentech and OS1 Pharmaceuticals, in heavy smokers
in an attempt to prevent lung cancer.
There can be a downside to giving a pill every day to prevent disease. Merck & Co.’s
anti-baldness drug, Proscar, was able in a large trial reported last year to reduce prostate cancer by 25%, but the
men on Proscar who did develop cancer tended to get more deadly tumors, possibly because of the drug. Still, cancer specialists are encouraged. “Oncology is two decades behind cardiology when it
comes to disease prevention, but we are beginning to get smarter about it,” says Dannenberg. The 212,000 women
likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer in the U.S. this year can only hope so.
-By
Catherine Arnst in New York
PAGE
48, Business Week ; June7, 2004
* Nearly all the studies which I have read comparing other NSAIDs to aspirin were flawed. For example, the ibuprofen is coated while they aspirin is not, or they would not
use equivalent doses. Drug companies are like politicians, the ends justifies
the means,
**
THE CANCER IS NOT DEPENDENT ON ESTROGEN OR PROSTOGLANDINS, BUT RATHER HAS ON THE
SURFACE OF THOSE CELLS RECEPTORS FOR ESTROGEN. WHEN STIMULATED BY ESTRONGEN THEY
DIVIDE MORE RAPIDLY. THUS A LIFE THREATENING BREAST CANCER (link to explanation of how cancer becomes life threatening) WILL GROW AND SPREAD FASTER. IN OTHER WORDS, THE CLOCK HAS BEEN
PUSHED FORWARD FOR THOSE WITH THE RIGHT SET OF MUTATIONS. A number of long-term
studies of birth control pills have confirmed this assumption, because after several years of taking estrogen the rate of
breast cancer approaches those who are not taking estrogen.--JK
Also on longevity is the article WHY WOMEN LIVE LONGER
Pancreatic cancer 53%
Lung cancer 33%
Diabetes caused blindness, coronary artery disease, strokes, and kidney failure reduced.
Dementia including Alzheimer’s disease reduced 42%.
Prostate cancer, significant delays in distant metastases, decreased rates of second
cancers, and improvement in overall survival
First myocardial infraction reduced 32%
C-section 400%
Laboratory studies have suggested that by inhibiting the COX-1 and COX-2 enzymes, aspirin
may enhanced programmed cell death (apoptosis) and inhibit the development of blood vessels (angiogensis) that feed a tumor
LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN SHOWN TO PREVENT PREGNANCY-INDUCED HYPERTENSIVE
DISEASE
ASPIRIN USERS HAVE ONE-FORTH THE NUMBER OF CESAREAN SECTIONS
The recent
meta-analysis of aspirin and pregnancy-induced hypertension by Imperiale and Petrulis caught our interest, and we examined
this issue from the standpoint of clinical decision making. Since the meta-analysis
included studies that were not randomized, not blinded, or used dipyridamole in addition to aspirin, we excluded data from
those studies. Using data from the remaining studies that addressed cesarean
sections, we found that 5.6% of the aspirin group required cesarean sections, compared with 23.9% of the control group. The maximum aspirin costs is $4.60 and the cost difference between cesarean and vaginal
birth of $3,014. Calculating 5.6% c-section plus the cost of aspirin yields $173 per patient,
for those without aspirin, 23.9% or $720.
Science News, Dec. 11, 1991, Vol.
266 No. 22
A PREEMPTIVE
STRIKE AGAINST CANCER
Aspirin cuts
risks gives a big boost to a slew of promising drugs
DRUG COMPANIES
ARE pouring billions of dollars into developing new targeted therapies for cancer,
and so far none are close to a cure. But there is a countervailing force to their quest: the search for widely available drugs
that could stop cancer from starting. Chemoprevention, as the field is called, just got a win with the news that aspirin,
already used to prevent heart disease, reduces the risk of the most common form of breast cancer. |
No one is ready to recommend that women start popping aspirin every day, in part because the drug can cause gastrointestinal
side effects. But the report, in the May 26 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association, does raise the
hope that women already taking aspirin to prevent heart disease may be getting another valuable benefit. “I think this
is a very important paper,” says Dr. Waun Ki Hong, a pioneer in chemoprevention at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
in Houston.
Hong says a number of drugs have now been shown to suppress cancer, including aspirin and similar nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAID5) such as ibuprofin. In fact, aspirin
has already been proven effective in preventing colon cancer. A stream of studies
over the last few yeas has also focused on aspirin’s potential against breast cancer, but with mixed results. The JAMA study by researchers from Columbia University, is noteworthy because it shows which type of breast
cancer would most likely be prevented—and why.
DOWNSIDE TO DAILY DOSES
THE RESEARCHERS
studied 3,000 Long Island women, half with breast cancer and half without, and analyzed
how often they took aspirin, ibuprofen (such as Advil), and acetaminophen (such as Tylenol). They found that 20.9% of the
women with breast cancer had taken aspirin regularly for six months or longer before they were diagnosed, compared with
24.3% of the women in the control group. That adds
up to a 20% lower risk of breast cancer for aspirin users vs. nonusers. The drug was most effective
against
tumors that are dependent* on the hormones estrogen and progesterone, reducing the risk of these types of cancers by 26%.
Hormone-dependent tumors account for 60% to 70% of
all breast cancer cases. Ibuprofen had a weaker effect, while acetaminophen, which is not an NSAID, offered no protection.
The Columbia scientists based their study on 10 years of lab research. They knew that aspirin blocks an enzyme in the
blood called COX-2 that stimulates estrogen production. Testing its effect in mice, Dr. Andrew J.
Dannenberg of Weill-Cornell Medical College, a co-author of the JAMA report, found that aspirin reduced
both estrogen and breast tumors.
Still, cancer experts say the Columbia study wasn’t flawless. It only followed the women for a year, and
was retrospective—the outcomes were based on participants’ reports of their own behavior and open to
bias, a problem with many such studies. But more money is being poured into prospective trials, which give a drug to a large
population over a number of years to see what happens. The National Cancer Institute is conducting a seven-year trial
with 22,000 women to see whether tamoxifen, a breast cancer treatment, or Eli Lilly & Co.’s Evista, an
osteoporosis drug, is better able to prevent breast cancer. Results are due in 2006.
The NCI says there are more than 40 other drugs
in chemoprevention trials, ranging from old standbys like aspirin to new targeted therapies such as AstraZeneca PLC’S Iressa, a lung cancer treatment approved in 2003. M.D.
Anderson doctors are testing Iressa and Tarceva, a similar drug by Genentech and OS1 Pharmaceuticals, in heavy smokers
in an attempt to prevent lung cancer.
There can be a downside to giving a pill every day to prevent disease. Merck & Co.’s anti-baldness
drug, Proscar, was able in a large trial reported
last year to reduce prostate cancer by 25%, but the men on Proscar who did develop cancer tended to get more deadly tumors,
possibly because of the drug.
Still, cancer specialists are encouraged. “Oncology is two decades behind cardiology when it comes to
disease prevention, but we are beginning to get smarter about it,” says Dannenberg. The 212,000 women likely to
be diagnosed with breast cancer in the U.S. this year can only hope so.
-By Catherine Arnst in New York
PAGE 48,
Business Week ; June7, 2004
*THE CANCER IS NOT DEPENDENT ON ESTROGEN OR PROSTOGLANDINS,
BUT RATHER HAS ON THE SURFACE OF THOSE CELLS RECEPTORS FOR ESTROGEN. WHEN STIMULATED
BY ESTRONGEN THEY DIVIDE MORE RAPIDLY. THUS A LIFE THREATENING BREAST CANCER
(link to explanation of how cancer becomes life threatening) WILL GROW AND SPREAD FASTER. IN
OTHER WORDS, THE CLOCK HAS BEEN PUSHED FORWARD FOR THOSE WITH THE RIGHT SET OF MUTATIONS.
Thus the results are suspect. In long-term
estrogen studies, after a moderate first couple of year surge, breast cancer rates for those on estrogen fell slightly below
the control group and the two became essentially equal. . For an account of the poor media work on hormone replacement therapy (HRT). --JK
|