^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/4/685.full
Why do sweets fatten our livers?1,2,3
1.
Lisa C Hudgins
+Author Affiliations
1.
1From The Rogosin Institute/Weill-Cornell
Medical College, New York, NY.
+Author Notes
1.
↵3Address
correspondence to LC Hudgins, The
Rogosin Institute, 310 East 67th Street, Room 2-43A, New York, NY 10021.
E-mail: lih2013@nyp.org.
See
corresponding article on page 727.
In recent years, the search for lifestyle changes that will slow
the obesity epidemic and its adverse sequelae has turned to dietary sugar. A
substantial number of calories come from beverages and desserts made with
sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup, which are absorbed as a mixture of glucose
and fructose. But apart from weight gain from excess sweet calories, what are the specific metabolic
consequences that are harmful to health?
The
best-documented adverse effect known for decades is the dyslipidemia that
develops with the ingestion of large amounts of sugar, even when substituted calorie
for calorie for fat (1). An
important mechanism is de novo lipogenesis (DNL), the synthesis of the SFA palmitate, from
glucose, fructose, or both. There is a marked increase
in DNL after excess carbohydrate calories (2) or the
isocaloric substitution of dietary glucose or mixed sugars for starch, complex
carbohydrate, or fat (1, 3). Although
the absolute quantity of synthesized fat is small, there are large increases in
plasma triglyceride concentrations and the ratio of palmitate to the essential
fatty acid linoleate (lipogenic index). Triglyceride
synthesis and secretion by the liver is increased by the generation of
palmitate, glycerol (the backbone of triglyceride), and malonyl coenzyme A (an
intermediate that inhibits fatty acid oxidation and channels fatty acids into
triglyceride). The fructose component of dietary sugar is particularly lipogenic
because of its uniquely high first-pass clearance by the liver. Increased plasma VLDL triglyceride, via cholesterol ester exchange
protein, produces the full spectrum of lipid abnormalities (high triglycerides,
small dense LDL, and low HDL) that accelerate atherosclerosis. Conversely, DNL
and triglyceride synthesis are rapidly suppressed during weight loss (2).
The
current study by Sevastianova et al (4) in this
issue of the Journal expands the lipogenic effects of dietary sugar beyond
dyslipidemia to include fatty liver. The results show for the first time a link
between excess dietary sugar and the accumulation of liver fat by DNL, a
pathway uniquely stimulated by dietary sugar. A small number of nondiabetic,
overweight adults, half of whom had fatty livers, consumed an excess of sugar
as candy and beverages for 3 wk. Details of the overall macronutrient
composition of the diets were not provided, but the excess sugar intake was
close to the 80th percentile of intake in the United States (5). Dietary
compliance was judged to be acceptable because the amount of weight gain was
that expected for the excess of calories. The results showed that a 2% increase
in body weight and similar increases in subcutaneous and visceral adipose
tissue were accompanied by a 27% increase in liver fat measured by proton
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Large increases were also observed in fasting
plasma VLDL and total triglycerides and DNL, as reflected by the lipogenic
index in triglycerides. HDL cholesterol also decreased (LDL size was not
measured). These changes were reversed at the end of a 6-mo hypocaloric,
low-sugar dietary period. Importantly, for the entire group, the increase in
the lipogenic index was positively correlated with the increase in liver and
serum triglycerides.
Hepatic
steatosis affects a large fraction of US obese adults and children and may
progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and liver failure. The
implication that a persistent excess of calories as dietary sugar can cause or
exacerbate fatty liver by DNL, a pathway unique to dietary sugars, lends
additional support to public health recommendations to limit dietary sugars.
The increased liver fat resulting from increased DNL and the imbalance between
triglyceride synthesis and secretion may increase oxidative stress,
inflammation, and insulin resistance (6). Indeed, in
this study, liver enzymes significantly increased after the high-carbohydrate
period, and there was a trend for an increase in fasting serum insulin. Whether
triglycerides enriched in SFAs are more damaging to human liver (7) is unknown
but deserves further study.
The most
tantalizing finding is also the most tentative given the small number of
subjects. Unlike subjects with the 148II variant of the gene for a lipase, PNPLA3, subjects with
the 148MM variant that is associated with fatty liver but low plasma
triglycerides did not show an increase in liver fat and plasma triglyceride in
proportion to DNL. The authors proposed that this was because of impaired
lipolysis of intrahepatic triglycerides and reduced VLDL assembly and
secretion. However, given that the increases in liver and plasma triglycerides
were similar between groups, this genotype does not appear to affect lipogenic
sensitivity to dietary carbohydrate, and other metabolic differences, including
response to high-fat diets, must be explored. Alternatively, the relation
between the lipogenic index and DNL may have been distorted if the lipase is
selective for specific fatty acids. Finally, other genes identified by
genome-wide association analysis have been associated with fatty liver,
including ApoC3, GCKR, and NCAN, which associate with either high- or low-serum triglycerides (8), but
dietary interactions have not been evaluated. The small number of subjects
sampled precludes testing for other potential confounding variables.
In conclusion, the results provide the impetus for the
measurement of liver and plasma triglycerides and DNL after a carbohydrate
challenge in a larger number of ethnically diverse subjects tested for genes
associated with fatty liver. In this way, the genetic heterogeneity for the
lipogenic effects of dietary sugar will be defined. Dietary recommendations to
restrict sugars can then have a stronger scientific rationale and target those
at greatest risk and the specific mechanism or mechanisms responsible.
http://ajcn.nutrition.org/content/96/4/727.short